Several years ago there was an article about the amount of chemical pollution that was in the water out west. Pollution from chemicals that were sprayed on the fields to keep bugs and weeds down. This article stated that this pollution may be responsible for the apparent "gayness" of the frogs. It seems scientist were observing that many of the male frogs in the area were attempting to reproduce with each other.
Now how they came to this conclusion I am not sure. It seems plausible that their could be a chemical attraction lost to the opposite sex based on chemical changes in the body chemistry. But does a bunch of confused frogs make biological case for being a gay?
Then again ... scientist have produced the theory of evolution as fact and the world has run to it, how much of a stretch to produce a theory of people being gay by biological reasons? Then again why do the left gay activist want this to be a biological decision? Are they feeling trapped in their choice of sin and looking for a good excuse to continue?
There is a "treatment" for being gay... but that is a whole other post :-)
Read the article, then read the origional post "Is Your Baby Gay? What If You Could Know? What If You Could Do Something About It?" ... it is interesting to say the least.
My favorite snip from the blog is:
Many homosexual activists recognize that the discovery of a biological marker or cause for homosexual orientation could lead to efforts to eliminate the trait, or change the orientation through genetic or hormonal treatments.